Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Freedom's Sentence


Tradition can be a great thing. It offers connections from generation to generation, it is an efficient way to obtain knowledge about the past, present, and future, and it is natural and practically stress-free with no need for change. There are many things I have learned about in my life through tradition, such as religion and family history. As Virginia Woolf explains in A Room of One's Own, male writers throughout history have had tradition before them, a kind of "sentence" to write off of. Although this "sentence" proved helpful and appreciated by male writers, "it was a sentence that was unsuited for a woman's use" (76). Initially I thought, "gosh that would have been such a disadvantage for past female writers. No tradition to follow? How could they even begin to write without examples laid before them?" After I thought about it, it became clear to me why this lack of tradition for women writers could be such a benefit...FREEDOM! "Indeed, since freedom and fullness of expression are of the essence of the art, such a lack of tradition, such a scarcity and inadequacy of tools, must have told enormously upon the writing of women" (77). And so it did. Female writers of the nineteenth century, like Charlotte Bronte and Jane Austen, received praise for their original works. When you think about it, female writers could have gone most anywhere with ideas for their writing, and that, to me, is reason enough to become a writer. The ability to express whatever you desire on a page with no set guidelines or anticipated criticism for going against the tide (of course there will always be criticism though) is unbeatable. I am tempted to say that male writers throughout history were the ones with the disadvantage because of their lack of freedom to write whatever they wanted, unlike nineteenth century women writers who could explore all types of writing and ideas to the ends of the earth. To boot, women writers of that time period receiving praise and acceptance for their works in the face of traditional male writing was a miraculous achievement. If I were given the choice between the two, I would have liked to be a female writer over a male writer during that time because of the freedom of expression and the ability to write my own sentence.

3 comments:

Kate Hennessy Bauer said...

Katie,

I really like your blog entry for this week! I love how you played with the coloring and added a picture...the coloring definitely made it easier to read, as well as add strength to some of the things you were saying!

I think you brought about an interesting question: would you rather have been a male or female writer back in the 19th century? you say you would rather be a female because there's more freedom of not having to live up to expectations of writers from the past. i think i agree with you mostly on this, except i'm not sure if i would use the word freedom. in woolf's "a room of one's own" she gives the example of judith shakespeare. although she had the potential of being an amazing writer, the society at that time would have been against her, and because she didn't have enough 'freedom,' to pursue her love of writing or acting, she would end up killing herself. woman back then certainly did not have freedom.

so, i definitely like the idea of not having to live up to everything previous writers have done, considering there were no previous woman writers. it's something i had never even thought of or considered.

now that i've reread your post, i guess perhaps you are using the word freedom differently than i had previously thought....they do have the freedom of expectations, that's for sure.

Carrie said...

The entire time I was reading the book I thought that Woolf was focusing on the disadvantages women faced. It was frustrating to me, because I would rather see women empower other women. But your blog put an interesting spin on Woolf's observation that women of her time did not have "a sentence" to begin with. I like that you emphasized (and pointed out in my case) that because women did not have "a sentence" they had freedom. Reading this blog made me like Woolf a little bit more!

Michelle said...

I like your thoughts on this, however, I'm not sure if I totally agree with you on men being at a disadvantage for writing. They could write what they wanted and some did. Shakespear took a different angle and wrote Sonnets, but they all had a deeper meaning and many were inspired by his life. And also, I'm not sure if I can fully agree that women had the freedom to explore all types of writing because I'm sure there were stories where men were being degraded (I'm just assuming this, it had to happen, there is always a bad guy in every story) and they were not allowed to be published based on their contex.